Lost & Pound

@FatPapaTony Vienna's so cute & this played better this time around. 😊

2:37 - There's a woman's silhouette in the doorway in the background.
2:54 - "No one's home"
Whatever! 🤣🤣🤣

I liked her extensive kissing & also using her pigtails as reigns. 🥰

Only thing I didn't like were the slaps to the face even if she asked for it. I'm not into it. Plus it didn't look good. You can tell Chad was holding back. If he had just hauled off & gave it everything he had then Vienna probably never ask to be slapped again. After the slaps she follows up with "Make me your dirty whore, please" Normally I'd think that's hot. But not after getting slapped. 😕

39:55 - The close up mish seemed a little off to me. The rest of the scene is pretty good tho. Not as blazing hot as _**Vienna's Sausage Party**_, but few scenes are. 😜

55:35 - "I gotta say, I'm so glad it was you who found the dog & not some other creepy weirdo"
Shhh, don't tell her, but I dognapped Junior & waited 'til the "Lost" posters to show up. 😈

5:41-6:01 10:42-10:59 29:53 42:33-42:45 - Page 755
Chad

> @mookyfadoon but how is the site choosing which videos to remaster?

We started with highly rated scenes, back when it was an experiment that we weren't sure we were going to sustain. Also it took a lot longer to do them at the time. We have since improved our process and significantly increased the hardware we're using, and it has become possible to remaster several scenes per week, so we switched to a plan of eventually remastering everything originally shot in a resolution lower than 6K.

Each set of source footage (i.e. each camera rig we've used) has it's own process for remastering, and so we tend to do things in batches, and are trying to get the oldest scenes done first. Also, there are some scenes that have low ratings due to a reason other than the actual quality of the scene (if there are technical issues in the first two hours of a scenes release, then the rating almost never recovers), which lead to a number of requests for "low" rated scenes that are otherwise widely enjoyed. So at this point we don't bring ratings into the selection process at all.

Most of the remastering processes are roughly the same, but there are two exceptions:
- The fist batch of scenes we did are in 30fps and have scale issues that can not be fixed in post-production. So those scenes will not get remastered.
- There was one 4K camera rig we used that had focus problems. It is possible to remaster those scenes, but it is significantly more time consuming compared to other scenes, so we are leaving those for last (we continue to work on ways to speed that process up, and also get ahead on other scenes so we have a bit of extra time to work on them).

So, ratings don't really factor into it anymore. The current plan is "all the scenes" with a very small number of exceptions.

There's nothing wrong with this video. So no offense to the guys who enjoy it.... but how is the site choosing which videos to remaster? This video currently has a rating *below* 60% ! Barely half of the users gave it a thumbs up, yet it was chosen over hundreds and hundreds of other videos to be remastered. Meanwhile some of my favorite videos posted years ago, with ratings in the high 90's, sit here un-remastered....